Packaging Regulations
PFAS in food packaging: Why it matters, and what the safer alternatives actually are

Grease-resistant liners like this one keep oil from soaking through to the box. For decades that performance came from PFAS coatings, which is why they are now restricted in food packaging across the EU.
PFAS gave takeaway packaging its grease resistance and left a problem behind. What the chemicals are, why regulators moved, and what replaces them in practice.

Zerocircle Staff
|
Share this post




What they are, without jargons
PFAS stands for per and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a family of thousands of synthetic chemicals built around an unusually strong bond between carbon and fluorine. That bond is the whole story. It is what makes PFAS brilliant at repelling grease and water, and it is what makes them almost impossible to break down afterwards.
Nothing in nature dismantles that bond efficiently. Not soil microbes, not composting, not the human body. The chemicals persist in the environment and accumulate in living things, which is where the nickname comes from.
In packaging, PFAS did a specific job: they gave paper the ability to hold oil and moisture out without a plastic liner. Fast food wrappers, microwave popcorn bags, takeaway containers, moulded fibre bowls. Anywhere paper had to survive contact with something greasy.
Why regulators moved
The health research on PFAS is large, genuinely complicated, and still developing. We are a materials company, not a health authority, so the clearest thing to point to is what the health authorities themselves have concluded.
In December 2023, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization, classified PFOA as carcinogenic to humans, its highest category. In the same assessment it classified PFOS as possibly carcinogenic. These are two of the most studied compounds in the PFAS family, not the whole family, and the classification describes hazard rather than the risk from any single product. But it is a significant finding from a conservative body, and it changed the regulatory conversation.
Food packaging attracted particular attention because it sits directly against what people eat, and because the pack does not stop existing after lunch. It goes into compost, landfill or a recycling stream, and the chemicals go with it.
What replaces them
PE liners and fluorochemical coatings held their position for decades, and it was because nothing else was available at the volume a national rollout needs. Brands that wanted to move found pilot quantities, long lead times and a converter who could not commit, and went back to what they could actually buy.
That is the constraint that has been shifting.
Grease and moisture resistance without fluorochemicals is achieved several ways today, and the choice is driven by format rather than by what is possible. Barrier coatings built from natural polymers, including the seaweed derived coatings we make, hold grease and moisture out while staying in the paper recycling stream rather than contaminating it.
Different formats pulling toward different answers is not a weakness in the category. It is what any material system doing real work across an industry looks like. Plastic is not one material either: a brand running PE, PP, PET and laminates across its range has never expected a single polymer to cover everything.
So the question worth putting to a supplier is no longer whether a material exists for your format. It is whether they can supply it at your volume, on your converter's line, with the documentation your market requires. That is a manufacturing question, and it is the one being answered right now.
Summary
PFAS are a family of synthetic chemicals used to make paper packaging resist grease and moisture. They work extremely well and they do not break down, which is why they are called forever chemicals and why regulators have spent the last three years restricting them. In the EU, limits on PFAS in food contact packaging have applied since August 2026, and compliance now has to be documented rather than declared. The alternatives are real and already running commercially and at scale.
PFAS in food packaging
PFAS free packaging
PPWR PFAS restriction
Share this post













